I'm not sure what is mean here. You can go to any application on
the iPhone that you had running. For example, if I check my fantasy
baseball team's stats and I then check the weather or send a text
message, I will find my same page open in Safari when I go back. If I
pause in writing a text message, that same message will be ready to
finish when I go back to the Message app. If I start to read an
article in Net News Wire and have to do something else, that article
will still be there waiting for me. There might not be a single key
to press to get you back, but don't say you can't go back to running
applications you had been using.
Take Care
John Panarese
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:11 AM, william lomas wrote:
>
> no but I mean that one can keep an application open on a nokia phone
> hold down menu to get back to it with no problems but it seems on an i
> phone you can't keep say an SMS open whilst on the web or something to
> come back to later
> WIll
>
> On 14 Jul 2009, at 09:04, Thuy wrote:
>
>>
>> Not strictly true that you have to close down one app to use another.
>> It's like windows mobile, where you press the home key to launch a
>> new
>> process. Then when you want to go back to the previous one, just
>> select it and you're back where you left off. Since screenreaders can
>> only give one focus at any given moment (and presumably we can only
>> interact with one thing at a time), this seems to make a lot of sense
>> to me, otherwise you would have multiple voices babbling away if you
>> really did want to be 'multi-tasking'?!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14/07/2009, william lomas <lomaswill...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> I agree with this.
>>>
>>> 1. i can multi task on a symbian phone i can not on the iphone
>>> 2. the thought of having to keep closing application x to use
>>> application y will be frustrating for symbian users, since i can
>>> have
>>> the web and an sms window open at same time
>>>
>>> 3. Using speech on a call on a symbian phone is in my view easier
>>> since if one dials numbers for an automated system, it is easier I
>>> think in my view, to type the number on a keypad, rather than having
>>> to mess around finding it on a dial pad etc
>>>
>>> On 13 Jul 2009, at 22:41, Damon Fibraio wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’m not 100 percent sure.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Damon Fibraio
>>>> screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype:
>>>> dfibraio
>>>> Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio
>>>> personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com.
>>>> Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow,
>>>> http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com
>>>>
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> ] On Behalf Of patrickneazer
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:31 PM
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone
>>>>
>>>> Hello Damon and all:
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea what to say in response to your question because I
>>>> have both an Iphone and a symbian 60 phone and I am sold on the
>>>> performance of the Iphone.
>>>>
>>>> So, let me ask a question of you and then possibly I would know
>>>> better how to respond.
>>>>
>>>> What sorts of comparisons are you wanting to make. What for example
>>>> would you want to see that would provide you with some sense that
>>>> the Iphone truly would be worth the effort and enthusiasm others
>>>> are
>>>> putting into it.
>>>>
>>>> I am not advocating that you drink the coolaide. I am asking
>>>> however
>>>> what flavor of drink would you like to order.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Damon Fibraio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK. I understand what you are saying. But is there anything about
>>>> the I-phone beyond that? I mean, featurewise or functionality. I am
>>>> replying to somebody who said they get more from the i-phone than
>>>> they get from their windows mobile phone and I am curious to know
>>>> why. What is different? I mean, I have been on the net with my
>>>> blackjack 2. Why is the i-phone better and easier? What else does
>>>> the i-phone do besides make calls and get on the net, for example?
>>>> This goes beyond the fact that voice over is built in and it saves
>>>> money. I got that part. I just hear that people are finding this
>>>> more powerful than a windows smart phone and I am curious to know
>>>> how.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Damon Fibraio
>>>> screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype:
>>>> dfibraio
>>>> Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio
>>>> personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com.
>>>> Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow,
>>>> http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com
>>>>
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> ] On Behalf Of Scott Howell
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:11 PM
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone
>>>>
>>>> Well let me put it into perspective from my point of view. When it
>>>> comes right down to it, cost, cost, and cost. All the adaptive
>>>> solutions you mention cost lots of money. I'm by no means unable to
>>>> afford the adaptive solutions, but I also realize that the adaptive
>>>> market is small and the cost will be considerably more do to the
>>>> limited market. However, why should I pay oh, maybe $150 for the
>>>> phone, $300 or so for the screen reader, and then another $895 for
>>>> the GPS solution. So, now I have invested $1,345 into a phone that
>>>> will get me around and generally offer me fairly accessible
>>>> benefits
>>>> to some apps. Where now with the iPhone I can spend $199 or $299
>>>> and
>>>> get great access to pretty much anything I need, tight integration
>>>> with my Mac without needing a third-party app that I would likely
>>>> have to pay for, and a future of other capabilities that will not
>>>> cost me nearly as much. So, really in my opinion I'd rather spend
>>>> the money on other things and really to be honest, it always will
>>>> come down to what works for you and fits within your budget. If you
>>>> are happy with the setup you have, then that is great and I am
>>>> pleased for you. However, the other thing here is choice and that
>>>> is
>>>> probably a close second in my book. Having choice is great and yes,
>>>> it is also great that I can just go to the Apple store and buy the
>>>> phone if I choose to do so and be up and running right away. I
>>>> don't
>>>> have to unregister and reregister a phone etc. Now of course don't
>>>> take my message as picking on you or any of the developers of the
>>>> software, I'm merely answering your question with my opinion.
>>>> Again , hey what works for you is all that matters in the end and
>>>> you are happy with your choice because you are the one using it,
>>>> not
>>>> me. :)
>>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Damon Fibraio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, consider me a newbie. I have a Samsung blackjack 2 windows
>>>> mobile smart phone with mobile speak and was planning on purchasing
>>>> mobile geo. I keep hearing everybody going absolutely crazy over
>>>> access to the I-phone. Can somebody tell me why this is so great? I
>>>> don’t really understand the hype. I do understand we get access
>>>> right out of the box with voice over. I do understand that once you
>>>> get used to the touch screen and the VO gestures and whatnot that
>>>> this is really great access, according to what everybody is saying.
>>>> But, why is the I-phone so great? Does it do GPS comparable to
>>>> mobile Geo or wayfinder? What does this phone do that is making
>>>> everybody turn inside out? I’d love to understand this, so any help
>>>> you can provide would be great. I have AT&T and probably could
>>>> switch if I wanted to, but I just don’t understand why this phone
>>>> is
>>>> the second coming.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Damon Fibraio
>>>> screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype:
>>>> dfibraio
>>>> Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio
>>>> personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com.
>>>> Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow,
>>>> http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com
>>>>
>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> ] On Behalf Of Scott Howell
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:37 PM
>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone
>>>>
>>>> Hey Josh, I think the same question can be asked of those users who
>>>> first laid hands on one of those touch-screen PDAs, but I guess
>>>> some
>>>> of those or most had keyboards. However, then we can take this same
>>>> logic to any new interface. For example, those who remember the
>>>> days
>>>> of switching from DOS to Windows or who used the Linux command line
>>>> and then moved to Gnome etc. Ah how the debate rages, but alas this
>>>> to shall pass. I myself can't wait to get an iPhone and I can
>>>> already see all the advantages it will offer over the windows
>>>> mobile
>>>> device I am using currently and don't much care for.
>>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What I'd like to ask all these folks saying the iPhone is so
>>>> inefficient is: How efficient were you three weeks after the first
>>>> time you ever touched a QWERTY keyboard? It's a whole new model for
>>>> human interface interaction. After three weeks, I have no problems
>>>> just touching the battery status, or really much of anything else.
>>>> Things are not hard to find. They do not move around, and the flick
>>>> method of navigation is great when you are having trouble with a
>>>> brand-new and unfamiliar screen.
>>>>
>>>> Sitting with an iPhone for an hour and then declaring it slow,
>>>> inefficient, and difficult to navigate is just silly. :) The ever
>>>> growing number of VI iPhone users will tell you the same. Sure, it
>>>> takes time to be comfortable. Once you are, it's fantastic. :)
>>>>
>>>> Josh de Lioncourt
>>>> …my other mail provider is an owl…
>>>>
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/Lioncourt
>>>> Music: http://stage19music.com
>>>> Mac-cessibility: http://www.Lioncourt.com
>>>> Blog: http://lioncourtsmusings.blogspot.com
>>>> GoodReads: http://goodreads.com/Lioncourt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4239 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Take good care and I wish you enough.
>>>>
>>>> Love
>>>>
>>>> Me
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>>> signature database 4240 (20090713) __________
>>>>
>>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
