I agree with this. 1. i can multi task on a symbian phone i can not on the iphone 2. the thought of having to keep closing application x to use application y will be frustrating for symbian users, since i can have the web and an sms window open at same time
3. Using speech on a call on a symbian phone is in my view easier since if one dials numbers for an automated system, it is easier I think in my view, to type the number on a keypad, rather than having to mess around finding it on a dial pad etc On 13 Jul 2009, at 22:41, Damon Fibraio wrote: > I’m not 100 percent sure. > > -- > Damon Fibraio > screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype: > dfibraio > Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio > personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com. > Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow, > http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com > > From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > ] On Behalf Of patrickneazer > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:31 PM > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone > > Hello Damon and all: > > I have no idea what to say in response to your question because I > have both an Iphone and a symbian 60 phone and I am sold on the > performance of the Iphone. > > So, let me ask a question of you and then possibly I would know > better how to respond. > > What sorts of comparisons are you wanting to make. What for example > would you want to see that would provide you with some sense that > the Iphone truly would be worth the effort and enthusiasm others are > putting into it. > > I am not advocating that you drink the coolaide. I am asking however > what flavor of drink would you like to order. > > > On Jul 13, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Damon Fibraio wrote: > > > OK. I understand what you are saying. But is there anything about > the I-phone beyond that? I mean, featurewise or functionality. I am > replying to somebody who said they get more from the i-phone than > they get from their windows mobile phone and I am curious to know > why. What is different? I mean, I have been on the net with my > blackjack 2. Why is the i-phone better and easier? What else does > the i-phone do besides make calls and get on the net, for example? > This goes beyond the fact that voice over is built in and it saves > money. I got that part. I just hear that people are finding this > more powerful than a windows smart phone and I am curious to know how. > > -- > Damon Fibraio > screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype: > dfibraio > Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio > personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com. > Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow, > http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com > > From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > ] On Behalf Of Scott Howell > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 3:11 PM > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone > > Well let me put it into perspective from my point of view. When it > comes right down to it, cost, cost, and cost. All the adaptive > solutions you mention cost lots of money. I'm by no means unable to > afford the adaptive solutions, but I also realize that the adaptive > market is small and the cost will be considerably more do to the > limited market. However, why should I pay oh, maybe $150 for the > phone, $300 or so for the screen reader, and then another $895 for > the GPS solution. So, now I have invested $1,345 into a phone that > will get me around and generally offer me fairly accessible benefits > to some apps. Where now with the iPhone I can spend $199 or $299 and > get great access to pretty much anything I need, tight integration > with my Mac without needing a third-party app that I would likely > have to pay for, and a future of other capabilities that will not > cost me nearly as much. So, really in my opinion I'd rather spend > the money on other things and really to be honest, it always will > come down to what works for you and fits within your budget. If you > are happy with the setup you have, then that is great and I am > pleased for you. However, the other thing here is choice and that is > probably a close second in my book. Having choice is great and yes, > it is also great that I can just go to the Apple store and buy the > phone if I choose to do so and be up and running right away. I don't > have to unregister and reregister a phone etc. Now of course don't > take my message as picking on you or any of the developers of the > software, I'm merely answering your question with my opinion. > Again , hey what works for you is all that matters in the end and > you are happy with your choice because you are the one using it, not > me. :) > On Jul 13, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Damon Fibraio wrote: > > > > OK, consider me a newbie. I have a Samsung blackjack 2 windows > mobile smart phone with mobile speak and was planning on purchasing > mobile geo. I keep hearing everybody going absolutely crazy over > access to the I-phone. Can somebody tell me why this is so great? I > don’t really understand the hype. I do understand we get access > right out of the box with voice over. I do understand that once you > get used to the touch screen and the VO gestures and whatnot that > this is really great access, according to what everybody is saying. > But, why is the I-phone so great? Does it do GPS comparable to > mobile Geo or wayfinder? What does this phone do that is making > everybody turn inside out? I’d love to understand this, so any help > you can provide would be great. I have AT&T and probably could > switch if I wanted to, but I just don’t understand why this phone is > the second coming. > > -- > Damon Fibraio > screen names -- aol: dfibraio...msn dfibr...@comcast.net. skype: > dfibraio > Find me on facebook as Damon fibraio or twitter as dfibraio > personal music site: http://www.keyboardguy.com. > Band web sites: THD, http://www.thdband.com. Days Before Tomorrow, > http://www.daysbeforetomorrow.com > > From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > ] On Behalf Of Scott Howell > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:37 PM > To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Article Slamming the iPhone > > Hey Josh, I think the same question can be asked of those users who > first laid hands on one of those touch-screen PDAs, but I guess some > of those or most had keyboards. However, then we can take this same > logic to any new interface. For example, those who remember the days > of switching from DOS to Windows or who used the Linux command line > and then moved to Gnome etc. Ah how the debate rages, but alas this > to shall pass. I myself can't wait to get an iPhone and I can > already see all the advantages it will offer over the windows mobile > device I am using currently and don't much care for. > On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote: > > > > > > What I'd like to ask all these folks saying the iPhone is so > inefficient is: How efficient were you three weeks after the first > time you ever touched a QWERTY keyboard? It's a whole new model for > human interface interaction. After three weeks, I have no problems > just touching the battery status, or really much of anything else. > Things are not hard to find. They do not move around, and the flick > method of navigation is great when you are having trouble with a > brand-new and unfamiliar screen. > > Sitting with an iPhone for an hour and then declaring it slow, > inefficient, and difficult to navigate is just silly. :) The ever > growing number of VI iPhone users will tell you the same. Sure, it > takes time to be comfortable. Once you are, it's fantastic. :) > > Josh de Lioncourt > …my other mail provider is an owl… > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/Lioncourt > Music: http://stage19music.com > Mac-cessibility: http://www.Lioncourt.com > Blog: http://lioncourtsmusings.blogspot.com > GoodReads: http://goodreads.com/Lioncourt > > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4239 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > Take good care and I wish you enough. > > Love > > Me > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > signature database 4240 (20090713) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
