I might be wrong, but Mac OS X has been around for quite a long time now, and it is possible to create Mac compatible apps without using the Cocoa framework. This is were I might really be wrong, but from what I heard yesterday from the WWDC keynote, and from what I've read, developers who make iPhone apps can only use a series of tools provided by Apple, with some 1000 API's, to create their software. So in such a restricted environment (that is, if I'm still not really wrong) shouldn't most apps just work with VO?
Ignasi On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Buddy Brannan wrote: > > > On Jun 9, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Alex Jurgensen wrote: > >> >> HI, >> >> YOU ARE MISSING THE FEATURE THAT ALLOWS YOU TO FIX APPLICATIONS THAT >> ARE NOT ACCESSIBLE. > > ...Which I only saw mention of in the OS X section, not in the iPhone > section. Not to say it won't be possible. And this feature likely > won't fix apps that simply expose nothing (or very little) to VO in > the first place. > > All that said, my understanding is that iPhone apps, like most modern > OS X apps, use a common set of development tools and standard > controls. This should mean that most will be at least somewhat > accessible from the start. No? > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
