On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 03:51:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | OK, got that working... looks OK. Patch attached.
> 
> I have some comments.
> 
> | -   <h3>LyX is what?!</h3> 
> | +   <h3>LyX is <em>what</em>?!</h3> 
> 
> Do we really have to use a question as headline?
> 
> "What is LyX?"
> 
> "LyX is an advanced document processor."
> 
> "LyX is what?"
 
What do you propose?
 
> |     <p>
> | -   LyX is an advanced open source document processor that encourages an
> | -   approach to writing based on the structure of your documents, not
> | -   their appearance. LyX lets you concentrate on writing, leaving
> | -   details of visual layout to the software.
> | +   LyX is an advanced open source 
> 
> Hmm da hm :-) What is 'advanced open source?'
> 
> | +   (<a href="about/license.php">GPL v.2</a>) document processor
> | +   that encourages an approach to writing based on the <em>structure</em> 
> | +   of your documents, not their appearance.
> |     </p>
> 
> LyX is an advanced document processor ... It is released under an
> Open Source license. 
> 
> (perhaps)
> 
> |  
> |     <p>
> | -   LyX was originally a Unix application, but now runs natively on
> | -   Windows and Mac OS X as well, thanks largely to the cross-platform Qt
> | -   toolkit.
> | +   LyX was written for people that write and want their writing to
> | look
> 
> LyX is written ...

"is being written" ?
 
> | +   great, out of the box. No more endless tinkering with formatting
> | +   details, 'finger painting' font attributes or futzing around with page
> | +   boundaries. You just write. In the background, LyX's legendary LaTeX
> | +   typesetting engine makes <em>you</em> look good.
> 
> LaTeX is not ours...
> 
> 'In the background the legendary (La)TeX typesetting engine makes you
> look good.'
> 
> |     </p>
> |  
> | -<p>LyX produces high quality, professional output -- using LaTeX, an 
> industrial
> | -strength typesetting engine, in the background; LyX is far more than a
> | -front-end to LaTeX, however.  No knowledge of LaTeX is necessary to use 
> LyX,
> | -although it will give a user more power.
> | -</p>
> | -
> | -   <p>LyX is stable and fully featured. It has been used for documents as 
> large
> | -   as a thesis, or as small as a business letter. Despite its simple GUI
> | -   interface (available in many languages), it supports tables, figures, 
> and
> | -   hyperlinked cross-references, and has a best-of-breed math editor. 
> | +   <p>
> | +   On screen, LyX looks like any word processor; its printed output -- or
> | +   richly cross-referenced PDF, just as readily produced -- looks like
> | +   nothing else.  Gone are the days of industrially bland .docs, all
> | +   looking similarly not-quite-right, yet coming out unpredictably
> | +   different on different printer drivers. Gone are the crashes 'eating'
> | +   your dissertation the evening before going to press.
> | +   </p>
> | +
> | +   <p>
> | +   LyX is stable and fully featured. It is a multi-platform, fully
> | +   internationalized application running natively on Unix/Linux and the
> | +   Macintosh and modern Windows platforms.
> |     </p>
> |  
> | +   <h3>But where did it come from?</h3> 
> | +
> | +   <p>
> | +   LyX was written for scientists by scientists, and it shows, in
> 
> This is the second time with "LyX was written".... dammit we are still
> writing it.

Touché
 
> Aren't we allowed to say "LyX is written"?
> 
> | +   world-class support for math and structured document creation. Such
> | +   staples of scientific authoring as reference list and index creation
> | +   come standard. But <em>you</em> don't have to be a scientist:
> | with LyX you
> 
> Perhaps not tout our index creation too much... not really great (but
> I have plans for it :-) )

It's pretty good with xindy ;-)

- Martin
 

Attachment: pgpK5oACWALoQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to