Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 03:51:28AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | OK, got that working... looks OK. Patch attached.
| >
| > I have some comments.
| >
| > | - <h3>LyX is what?!</h3>
| > | + <h3>LyX is <em>what</em>?!</h3>
| >
| > Do we really have to use a question as headline?
| >
| > "What is LyX?"
| >
| > "LyX is an advanced document processor."
| >
| > "LyX is what?"
|
| What do you propose?
Not sure really... perhaps nothing.
| > LyX is written ...
|
| "is being written" ?
That sound strange doesn't it?
| > This is the second time with "LyX was written".... dammit we are still
| > writing it.
|
| Touché
Tough? Touche?
|
| > Aren't we allowed to say "LyX is written"?
| >
| > | + world-class support for math and structured document creation. Such
| > | + staples of scientific authoring as reference list and index creation
| > | + come standard. But <em>you</em> don't have to be a scientist:
| > | with LyX you
| >
| > Perhaps not tout our index creation too much... not really great (but
| > I have plans for it :-) )
|
| It's pretty good with xindy ;-)
The result yes, but not the process of stetting up the index in the
first place.
--
Lgb
