>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Andre> wrote: >> >> >> | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is >> responsible >> >> | for the additional 100s? [...] | question. It's >> basically the same we would get from a "flat" | make within mathed, >> isn't it? >> >> Yes, it should be. Andre> So now the question is whether we can take advantage of this. Andre> g++ is seemingly able to compile the whole of lyx three times Andre> faster than what we see right now There has been some discussion about this in the wine project (and maybe for linux kernel too) several years ago. One drawback I remember is that everything will break if one has two static functions with the same name in the .C files. Andre> PS: I've been pretty stupid during the meeting. We could have Andre> saved quite some time by ssh'ing to soem faster machines just Andre> around the corner. Sorry for that. This gave us more time to talk... Andre> PPS: For those interested in the next 'break everything' patch: Andre> So far I have no further drawing regressions (there's still Andre> this funny 'boxes have wrong width' thing) and navigation and Andre> selection working on outer text. I have to have a look at the previous patch you sent to get an idea of what you're doing. JMarc
