On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:33:13AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > > | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is > > | responsible for the additional 100s? > > > > Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess. > > Recursive make is partially to blame for that I would imagine as > there's a lot of redundant work performed by each level of make.
Can one use automake to create non-recursive Makefiles? Andre'
