On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:57:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is responsible > >> | for the additional 100s? > >> > >> Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess. > > > | Recursive make is partially to blame for that I would imagine as > | there's a lot of redundant work performed by each level of make. > > Is that much extra work done if you already stand in the math dir when > compiling?
Good question. It's basically the same we would get from a "flat" make within mathed, isn't it? Andre'
