Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 08:33:13AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
>> > | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is
>> > | responsible for the additional 100s?
>> >
>> > Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess.
>>
>> Recursive make is partially to blame for that I would imagine as
>> there's a lot of redundant work performed by each level of make.
>
| Can one use automake to create non-recursive Makefiles?
Yes, and I did that as an expiriemnt just two days ago... we didn't
gain much...
--
Lgb
