Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:57:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> | So am I right in assuming that the whole make machinery is responsible
>> >> | for the additional 100s?
>> >>
>> >> Dependency tracking and suck can take some time I guess.
>> >
>> | Recursive make is partially to blame for that I would imagine as
>> | there's a lot of redundant work performed by each level of make.
>>
>> Is that much extra work done if you already stand in the math dir when
>> compiling?
>
| Good question. It's basically the same we would get from a "flat"
| make within mathed, isn't it?
Yes, it should be.
I also ran a test where I turned off dependency tracking, almost no
difference.
--
Lgb
