On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:

> >From a quick look this seems to be you defending your decisions, not
> somebody else requesting the change, and certainly not the broad
> agreement 'by the project leaders' you like to cite.

Since when it is necessary for somebody else to propose a change before
it's accepted ? i.e. what kind of weird reasoning is this ?

>   > [...]
>   > 4. move preferences to the end of edit
>   
>   [John:] No, over my dead body :)
> 
> Your answer to Edwin is consistent to the one I get from you. Well
> done. However, this does not necessarily mean it is a good answer nor
> is it an indication of any kind of consensus.

Wow, selective editing is pretty low.

> Like making 'd' the short cut for Insert->Index  when 'Index' is the
> only word starting with 'I' in that menu. Clever choice.

OK, that's it. You're obviously wrong and now you directly call me an
idiot.

Goodbye.

-- 
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Reply via email to