On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 09:43:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I'd actually prefer some > | > | 'special-char-insert thin-space' > | 'special-char-insert protected-space' > | > | etc. for almost the same reasons I'd like to have a single 'math' (or > | similar) Lfun for everything math related... > > You complicate the minibuffer a lot... > (think completion)
For completion purposes the space could simply be ignored. Splitting the names would make the actual interface much slimmer, and extending a "module" (read "mathed" or some other "complex" inset like tabular) does not require changes to the "core" (and I tend to consider the current need to do so a fundamental architectural flaw of LFUNS) Note that e.g. tabular already does exactly this (even if not officially called so) with its 'tabular-feature' LFUN. Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
