Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 um 16:35:10, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2016-09-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:02:52AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > > >> These tests are inverted, because compilation fails here. > > > I see. > > >> If the inverted tests "fail to fail" at your site, the lines > ... > >> should be moved from suspiciousTests to unreliableTests under > >> Sublabel: varying_versions > > > Ah I forgot about that. And I suppose the inversion status should depend > > on the newest version. For example, if there are different test results > > based on different statuses of TeX Live packages, then the test should > > pass for the user with the updated TeX Live 2016, right? > > While I agree with this in theory, actually the labeling mechanism is > constructed so that inversion takes precedence and prevents tagging with > "unreliable". > > Maybe this can be changed in an overhoul of the test setup...
Yes, there is some discussion needed.
> Günter
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
