On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:04:20AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 um 16:35:10, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> > > On 2016-09-08, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Ah I forgot about that. And I suppose the inversion status should depend > > > on the newest version. For example, if there are different test results > > > based on different statuses of TeX Live packages, then the test should > > > pass for the user with the updated TeX Live 2016, right? > > > > While I agree with this in theory, actually the labeling mechanism is > > constructed so that inversion takes precedence and prevents tagging with > > "unreliable". > > > > Maybe this can be changed in an overhoul of the test setup... > > Yes, there is some discussion needed. I see. Sounds complicated. In the mean time, if anyone wants to compare logs regarding the following tests, which fail for me (i.e. the export succeeds), let me know: INVERTED.TODO_export/doc/el/Intro_pdf5_texF INVERTED.TODO_export/doc/el/Intro_pdf5_systemF INVERTED.TODO_export/doc/nb/Intro_pdf5_texF I should also say that I have not checked whether the output is correct, or if e.g. the export is without error but the PDF contains gibberish. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
