2014-04-09 10:49 GMT+02:00 Vincent van Ravesteijn: > I don't understand why you keep saying that only the RTL flag is > missing, while we have made it clear to you that there is so much more > missing. It's a bit shocking you didn't even know that arabic > characters change shape depending on whether they are connected to the > character before, after, both, or to none. And even when you had the > two examples next to each other on screen, you still didn't notice > this difference. > > I can easily allow you to fix the flags, but we also agreed on not > advertizing unusable languages. And still, I see on the NewInLyX21 > page that we now support "Urdu" and "Syriac". So, as long as you don't > act on feedback from others and, even worse, you seem to forget what > others tell you, you cannot expect others to act on yours. >
I think this is a similar case than the Bibtex errors: We are not sure (or even think that) this is not yet ready for prime time. I propose the following: Disable this feature for the 2.1 release. If you just comment out the language entry, Jamil can easily enable it again on his side (without recompiling) and help us testing and finishing the support for this language. I think this is a reasonable compromise. Jürgen > > Vincent >
