On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > 09/04/2014 11:06, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> Am I misunderstanding or will we have a 90% solution if we just assume >> that the script is the same as arabic ? Then there are only a few >> exceptions that might need special attention ? > > > The problem is to have the equivalent of Encodings::transformChar (and of > the arabic_table[172] array) for Urdu.
Urdu uses the same script, so the same arabic_table can be reused, just as the table is also used for Farsi. Some specific Urdu letters are not implemented in this table, but it is almost trivial to fix that. Vincent
