Uwe Stöhr wrote: [snip a lot about third world problems]
> OK, I have never been in a country where Urdu is spoken, Jamil could state > more precisely about it, I only wanted to explain why I think our strict > rules are not helpful in every case for every region. (Which does not mean > that I want to weak LyX's development rules in principle! I only refer to > language support.) I understand your motivation to help people in developing countries (and I appreciate it), but please do not assume that your proposed solution of a particular problem is the only one which is feasible. Claiming that LyX supports a new language although it was not tested enough is an absolute no- go. We cannot lie to our users. However, if a new language which is not tested enough is clearly marked as experimental I don't see any problem: People who want a stable solution are warned that they should not use it, and people in desperate need of a document processor in their native language can try it out and contribute improvements. Georg
