Am 02.06.2010 um 10:39 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 18.05.2010 um 22:46 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am 18.05.2010 um 20:01 schrieb Andre Poenitz: >> >>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:52:54PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: >>>> Am 17.05.2010 um 21:27 schrieb Andre Poenitz: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:20:34PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>>>>> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>>>>>> Since I go no more translation updates after the mailing list >>>>>>> revival, I will try to set up Lyx 1.6.6 now. Please stand by. >>>>>> >>>>>> please make it clear in the announce that we encourage people to build >>>>>> it against Qt 4.5 and not 4.6 (#6608). >>>>> >>>>> Can anyone remind me what the issues with Qt 4.5/4.6/4.7 are? >>>> >>>> Andre', do you think LyX builds with Qt 4.7 are running better then with >>>> 4.6? >>> >>> That's what I'd try to figure out once I know what the problems in 4.5 >>> and 4.6 are. The problems being present only on Mac does not make it >>> easier for me, though... >> >> I have to admit that I ignored some font oddities I saw since my upgrade to >> Snow Leopard. >> And it's not only LyX where I saw it. The umlauts of times roman fonts e.g. >> Maybe it's not a Qt or LyX problem... >> >>>> Should I try this? >> >>> In any case I would not expect much changes (if any at all) in the areas >>> that are interesting for LyX before 4.7.0 from now on, so for all >>> practical reasons 4.7.0 beta1 should be as good or as bad as the final >>> from LyX's point of view. >> >> So I'll give it a try. >> >>> There have been changes to the font handling in 4.7 cycle, also >>> regarding the x positioning of glyphs. I've been bitten by one bug there >>> myself, but this has been fixed again in the mean time. >>> >>> Maybe someone who knows how to reproduce the 4.5/4.6 problem could >>> indeed try 4.7.0 beta and see whether it makes a difference? > > I've built the svn version with the qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.7.0-beta1 > download. > > There is a difference in display of text as demonstrated by the following two > screen shots. > Qt4.7 is slightly better but the umlauts are not displayed correctly too. > > The first is produced with the alpha3 release made with > qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.6.2. > > <Bildschirmfoto 2010-06-02 um 10.24.35.png> > > The second one I've made with the current lyx-svn + qt-4.7.0-beta1. > > <Bildschirmfoto 2010-06-02 um 10.24.59.png> > > With both versions I cannot reproduce the so called 4.5/4.6 problem.
Ok, I have to correct my last statement. With Qt4.7.0 beta I have drawing problems with very long words. Then the cursor is drawn right shifted. The longer the word is the wider the offset of the misplaced cursor is. This is a problem I don't have with Qt4.6.2. See the screenshot below:
<<inline: Bildschirmfoto 2010-06-02 um 12.28.57.png>>
Stephan
