Uwe Stöhr wrote: > However, I also use gettext 0.15.x to remerge. I don't know why this > remerge has different linebreaks.
now i'm confused how poedit and gettext usage are joined (sorry i dont use poedit). can you describe the exact steps of your po-updates/remerges? where poedit comes in play and where gettext? >(A newer version of gettext is not yet > available for Windows, that's also the reason why changing the LyX menu > language doesn't work on Windows via the preferences menu. Joost is working > on that and I cannot update gettext until he finished this work.) i see. Joost, is there any progress? > There's another problem. Even when Jürgen remerges and our translators send > us po-files modified with Poedit, Pootle, Virtaal or whatever, we would > have linebreak diffs. > > What we could do is to save every file we get with one defined program > before committing. this is one possibility. > I propose Poedit because this is available on all platforms. gettext itself this breaks autotools business. for example if i'm creating new tarball complete remerge happens and we are back in our problem. > editing po-files without a special > editor is a pain. hard to say. i'm quite happy with vim. currently i see 4 possibilities: - we all move back to gettext 0.15 - we will let people send us any file and commiting this file is fine however the full remerge of all files will be done only by new gettext (ie by me or Juergen) - ask Joost whether new gettext is possible - reconcile with the current situation until new poedit is released pavel
