Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Will Robertson wrote:
So you don't think it's confusing to have *three* choices in the list
of fonts that look, on casual inspection, exactly the same? And rather
un-helpful to have AE when LM is the same but better in every way?
I personally agree with Will. Most users won't know how to change the
document font; I barely know myself. A beautiful default would be best.
The glyphs are the same, so that is not the point. The point is that
LM fonts come in a vector (rather than bitmap) format making them more
suitable to pdf output.
OK, thanks for the explanation. The fact that they are suitable to pdf
output is a good argument for making them the default, at least for
pdflatex conversion (which the majority uses I guess by now). Perhaps
this this already the case?
Abdel.
