> But in general, I agree that this is the most clean solution probably. Bo, you
> are the python expert. What is your take on this proposal, as opposed to
> yours? Could you have a go at this?

This can be easily done. I did not do it because I believe that lyx
should start with correctly-configured lst files. Using wrong lists
that make lyx 'somehow works' makes no sense to me. Also, in my cases
(one reported, one from myself), configure.py fails because it takes
too much time so is brutally killed. In this case, no exception
handling can help unless we first use default .lst file, and replace
them with correct ones after configure is done correctly.

Bo

Reply via email to