Helge Hafting wrote: > Just wonder why we don't go for iso8859-15, which is supposed to be > iso8859-1 with the euro added. Or is latex support for iso8859-15 > weaker?
latin9 is just another name for iso8859-15. > Oh well, latin9 don't seem to loose us anything useful. > Perhaps lyx2lyx should convert any "3/4" "1/4" and "1/2" glyphs to > nicefrac though? That falls in the "try to be too clever" range IMHO. If a user entered these symbols he probably had a reason. A search/replace that would work with insets would be far better IMHO. Georg
