>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>  Very good news. Abdel, it would be nice to refrain from using
>> stuff not available in 4.0, unless of course there is a real
>> problem. We have to define a minimal version and stick to it.

Abdelrazak> I don't see any need to stick to this old version that
Abdelrazak> won't be available anywhere... Qt4.1.2 or 4.1.3 would be
Abdelrazak> the logical choice.

If I look at the latest available mandriva version now (2006.0), the
qt they provide (in contrib) is 4.0.1 (so probably too old according
to Andre). I am not going to do research on all distributions, but
this should be done.

We have to select some version and stick to it. What distributions has
4.1.x included now? Selecting a version that nobody carries as
standard would be a very very bad idea.

Abdelrazak> If we are continuing to support qt3, then it doesn't make
Abdelrazak> sense to refrain ourself. So I'd suggest that we use
Abdelrazak> instead latest and greatest Qt4.2 instead to make use of
Abdelrazak> some interesting new features for the math panel, the
Abdelrazak> mini-buffer completion framework and the Font selection
Abdelrazak> dialog.

The qt4 frontend maintainer has to make _some_ effort at _some_ time
to ensure that it is not just a funny project to be used by its
developers and a few people who love to recompile libraries every
other week. There is a reason why we stick to python 2.2; José
proposed a balance between the features we need and the availability
of this version. There was a reason why we were careful to have lyx
1.3 compatible with qt2 (we could have told the poor windows user:
just install a X server and don't hassle us). There is a reason why we
catter for gcc 3.1.

A frontend is not just a playground for new toys. If you want qt4 to
become the standard frontend, you have to do something about it.
Chasing the latest fun features of Qt is not the right way to see
things in my opinion.

>>  Sure. My quest to find someone making sure this task is
>> straight-forward is still ongoing.

Abdelrazak> What would this investigation work contains? Qt4 readme
Abdelrazak> file lists the supported platforms, isn't that enough?

You do not read lyx-users a lot, do you?

JMarc

Reply via email to