Abdelrazak Younes wrote:

The only sane approach is then to provide two packages: one statically linked to Qt4.2 and one dynamically linked to it.

This way, KDE4 users will enjoy sharing the same Qt4 with LyX. For non-KDE4 user there is absolutely no drawback to use a statically linked LyX except for a few additional megabytes in memory.

Just a small precision: this does not mean that we don't have to be source incompatible with Qt4.0. This is an entirely different question that needs to be weighted against Qt4.2 new features.

Abdel.

Reply via email to