On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:29:03AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> KDE4 is just _one_ user of Qt 4. All recent distributions > Andre> already have Qt 4 (in parallel to Qt 3) > > But since qt4 devs seem to think that anything else than the latest > version of qt4 (or the next) is not worth trying (ok, I exagerate a > bit...), I am not sure how many distribs have 'good enough' version. > > What is this good enough version, BTW? 4.1.0?
4.0.2 is the first version I'd consider usable for the kind of stuff LyX uses. I personally need a few things that make 4.1.3 sort of a lower limit, but that's stuff not used in LyX (heavy polygon drawing in using the raster painter). Ap[rt form that compiliing Qt is straight-forward with minimal dependencies on the build environment, i.e. it is accessible for everybody. Building LyX is more complicated for that matter. > >> One more thing, If you have difficulties maintaining qt3 frontend, > >> I can try to handle it. > > Andre> Waste of resources. > > It could be argued that the waste of resource was to force the qt4 > switch right now :) It could. But it would hit the mark. Andre'
