On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:30:47AM +0000, Russell Coker wrote: > > Not at all. The distributed and decentralised part of email is > inherently not mailing lists. By definition lists are centralised!
By that logic, either are mailbox providers, as they are also centralised > No it just means that you have to use other services. Yes, a "reputable" one, as defined by what ever criteria some few large corporations dictate. > [...] Which would still fail if corporations suddenly started dictating that you must have a DMARC policy for your mail to be accepted. > As for censorship, if you are worried about that then you probably > shouldn't be using Gmail at all. Agreed, we should all run our own mail services. Or at least, select those with sane policies if we want to be uncensored. > The real issue is that nothing we agree on matters much if Google and > Yahoo don't agree. Also agreed, pretty much what I was inferring with the hyperbole about Internet nuetrality.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
