On 15/01/2016 12:14 AM, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:42:23 PM Erik Christiansen via luv-main wrote:
>>> I got it wrong, was actually referring to From:  address munging.
>>
>> Nah, I wouldn't hold my breath. Hints on that one have been going to
>> /dev/null since last year. It seems we're all supposed to undo the crap
>> individually at our ends.
> 
> We had a problem of Gmail and other recipients falsely regarding mail from 
> the 
> LUV server as forged and assigning it to the spam folder.

Nothing that can't be fixed with a filter (use the "Never send it to
spam" option in the Gmail filter for LUV list mail).
> 
> We are dealing with a couple of bugs in Mailman, what I consider to be a 
> deficiency in OpenDKIM and some interactions between SPF and DMARC.
> 
> If you would like to help with some of these technical issues then go for it.
> 
> http://postmaster.facebook.com/reputation_and_authentication
> 
> Facebook is now compelling sysadmins to use SPF or DKIM.  This isn't going to 
> go away.  It's only a matter of time before Internode starts using DKIM to 
> placate Facebook.
> 
Looks like it's a case of having to follow suit., like it or not.

-- 
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to