I can run build TargetTests though (I guess it doesn't depend on editline), and that one passes.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:26 PM Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > ============= > Issue Details > ============= > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_and_run_command_dwarf > (lang/c/register_variables/TestRegisterVariables.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_and_run_command_dwo > (lang/c/register_variables/TestRegisterVariables.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_dwarf > (functionalities/thread/exit_during_break/TestExitDuringBreak.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_dwo > (functionalities/thread/exit_during_break/TestExitDuringBreak.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_gdb_set_target_async_off > (tools/lldb-mi/TestMiGdbSetShow.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_process_output > (tools/lldb-mi/syntax/TestMiSyntax.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_lldbmi_settings_set_target_run_args_after > (tools/lldb-mi/interpreter/TestMiInterpreterExec.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_multiple_debuggers_dwarf > (api/multiple-debuggers/TestMultipleDebuggers.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_process_interrupt_dwo > (functionalities/thread/state/TestThreadStates.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_sb_api_listener_resume_dwarf > (api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_sb_api_listener_resume_dwo > (api/multithreaded/TestMultithreaded.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_with_dwarf (lang/cpp/printf/TestPrintf.py) > UNEXPECTED SUCCESS: test_with_dwo (lang/cpp/printf/TestPrintf.py) > > =================== > Test Result Summary > =================== > Test Methods: 1905 > Reruns: 0 > Success: 1203 > Expected Failure: 117 > Failure: 0 > Error: 0 > Exceptional Exit: 0 > Unexpected Success: 13 > Skip: 572 > Timeout: 0 > Expected Timeout: 0 > > I can't seem to run unittests because I'm getting undefined references to > editline which I haven't dug into, but the regular tests pass. > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:47 PM Pavel Labath via Phabricator < > revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > >> labath accepted this revision. >> labath added a comment. >> This revision is now accepted and ready to land. >> >> OK, let's give this another shot. (I haven't tried it on linux yet, so if >> you haven't either then let's wait until tomorrow, or maybe @eugene could >> try it out (?)). I don't think we need to be worried about symlink >> overwrite in the ModuleCache test. >> >> >> >> ================ >> Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h:500 >> +/// @param result Set to true if \a path is a directory (after following >> +/// symlinks, false if it is not. Undefined otherwise. >> /// @returns errc::success if result has been successfully set, >> otherwise a >> ---------------- >> missing closing paren here >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D30698 >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
