On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:45:32PM -0700, Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote: > > I really don't like setting the physical address this way, > > can we not do this via the device tree? > > Cache-sram does not have any device tree entry since it is not a > hardware as such. Putting it under chosen can be another option. > I think, Scott (cc'ed) was of the opinion that since 32b base > address support is missing; so there is no point in moving this > address to the command line and .config should be okay for now > for it.
I don't know what you mean by "32b base address support is missing". I have no objection to putting it on the command line. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
