Mahajan Vivek-B08308 wrote:
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 PM
Cache-sram does not have any device tree entry since it is not a
hardware as such. Putting it under chosen can be another option.
I think, Scott (cc'ed) was of the opinion that since 32b
base address
support is missing; so there is no point in moving this
address to the
command line and .config should be okay for now for it.
I don't know what you mean by "32b base address support is
missing". I have no objection to putting it on the command line.
It was a typo, it should be missing 36b address support. Since the
kernel
did not run under different environment (i.e 32b / 36b base address); so
it
was decided that .config may be okay for this.
The kernel *will* run with a 36-bit address map even if some of our
drivers don't support it right at the moment -- so we should be planning
for it.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
