On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >> >>> Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32 >>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still >>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts. >> >> >> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like >> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a >> burden on many drivers. >> > I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat > the h8300 experience.
So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle? P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit: R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
