On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: > Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32 >>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still >>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts. >>>> >>>> >>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like >>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a >>>> burden on many drivers. >>>> >>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat >>> the h8300 experience. >> >> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle? >> >> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit: >> R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose. > > The error goes away if CONFIG_AIO_THREAD is disabled. Still don't know why.
A straight guess: it has reduced enough room to fit the relocation window? Anyway confirm that after disabling that kernel builds as usual. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
