Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: >> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32 >>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still >>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts. >>> >>> >>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like >>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a >>> burden on many drivers. >>> >> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat >> the h8300 experience. > > So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle? > > P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit: > R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose.
I'd like to try fixing it before we delete anything. At the very least, it's always a good idea to figure out exactly why it broke, just to be sure it isn't a broader issue that has yet to manifest itself elsewhere. -- Måns Rullgård
