Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: >>>> On 02/08/2016 08:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Not very surprising either. The number of people using Linux on avr32 >>>>>> is probably approximately zero, and if anyone is, they're likely still >>>>>> running 2.6.32 or thereabouts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once I tried up the topic about removal avr32 for good, but looks like >>>>> it wasn't a good time. Maybe now is better? It would really reduce a >>>>> burden on many drivers. >>>>> >>>> I would agree, as long as the maintainers agree. We don't want to repeat >>>> the h8300 experience. >>> >>> So, are we going to agree that avr32 must be retired from next cycle? >>> >>> P.S. I have no idea how to fix this "…relocation truncated to fit: >>> R_AVR32_21S…", though I can test anything anyone propose. >> >> The error goes away if CONFIG_AIO_THREAD is disabled. Still don't know why. > > A straight guess: it has reduced enough room to fit the relocation window?
That was my first guess as well, but it was wrong. See the patch I just sent for an explanation. -- Måns Rullgård
