> 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue I think we only care about this when they become free software. > 2. There are architectures where gcc is not yet available, but vendor C > compilers are. That need to run Linux - name one ? Why try to solve a problem when it hasn't happened yet. Let whoever needs to solve it do it. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? George
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jan Dvorak
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Bill Nottingham
- non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc... Alan Cox
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did ... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where ... Ben Ford
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: non-gcc linux? Tim Riker
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Kai Henningsen
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: W... Tim Riker