> Alan's message wasn't clear, but it seemed to imply that a patch to add > this script to 2.4.x would be submitted to Linus. gcc 2.95.2 is a bit > smarter about some things, and I definitely prefer using that compiler. > I also prefer fixing 2.4.x kernel<->compiler bugs rather than defaulting > people to an older compiler. I haven't submitted it. Im happy to do so if people want it in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.... Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Kurt Garloff
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? George
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jan Dvorak
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-tes... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Bill Nottingham