On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:42:28AM +1000, Arik Baratz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Imri Zvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It means they have 208 IPs that sent at least *one* spam in the past 7 days > > from a range that includes 131070 hosts! > > The way they are calculating it, it means it could be that they only got > > 208 spam emails in the last 7 days, and that was enough to block the whole A > > class. I'm sorry, but this is not reasonable - It doesn't even leave room > > for the ISP to cooperate and deal with the spammer. > > > > I need to understand - are you in favor of blocking port 25? How many > > people in this list thinks it's a good idea? > > > > > Although I don't think it's good to block port 25, I think that allowing > port 25 only for customers who sign an agreement which says that: > > * They will pay 1500NIS for every message from their account > - backed by a credit card with pre-authorization of the card
That's blocking port 25 effectively. Regaredless of the conditions. -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
