Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2011, 13:41:45 schrieb Urs Liska: > In the context of Joseph Wakelings thoughts I'd say: Any LilyPond > source, good or bad will require at least on person on the publishers > side that will deal with it. > And with a little wider perspective: It will require that the publisher > can rely on having such a person around also when they have to deal with > the score again sometimes.
Plus, they need need to be sure that when they try to edit that file in 3 years that lilypond will still process it without any work and it should look exactly like before. That's also one of the current problems iwth lilypond: The syntax changes regularly, and you need to update your scores every few months to be able to run them properly. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
