Am Donnerstag, 25. August 2011, 13:41:45 schrieb Urs Liska:
> In the context of Joseph Wakelings thoughts I'd say: Any LilyPond
> source, good or bad will require at least on person on the publishers
> side that will deal with it.
> And with a little wider perspective: It will require that the publisher
> can rely on having such a person around also when they have to deal with
> the score again sometimes.

Plus, they need need to be sure that when they try to edit that file in 3 
years that lilypond will still process it without any work and it should look 
exactly like before. That's also one of the current problems iwth lilypond: 
The syntax changes regularly, and you need to update your scores every few 
months to be able to run them properly.

Cheers,
Reinhold


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
 * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to