How difficult is the possibility to integrate Lilypond into CEDET? It seems that CEDET is the way Emacs is going now.
2010/7/15 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarr...@gmail.com> > Also differentiating lilypond code and scheme code. > The mmm mode could be useful to combine this two major modes: > http://mmm-mode.sourceforge.net/ > Just an idea. > > 2010/7/15 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> > > Tim McNamara <tim...@bitstream.net> writes: >> >> > Nicolas Sceaux wrote: >> >> Having a useful lilypond mode in Emacs would be really great. >> > >> > Using the existing lilypond-mode for all my .ly file editing already >> > and it's pretty useful to me- but of course there is always room for >> > improvement. What are you thinking that you'd like to see? >> > >> > I'd like to see parsing for missing/misplaced brackets, maybe some >> > kind of validation function like Tidy is for HTML, since that is >> > something that trips me up sometimes and can be hard to debug. >> >> Indentation goes downhill completely sometimes (in particular when using >> things like -> accents) and is hopeless regarding Scheme. Syntax >> highlighting can be rather weird. There is no automatic conversion >> between absolute and relative modes, or editor-level transpositions or >> augmentation. Syntax can't distinguish between chord mode, lyrics, >> markups and so on. You can't start a new Lilypond compilation before >> killing your viewer. You can't, say, quickly play the notes of a >> passage without running them through Lilypond (since Emacs does not >> understand the notes it sees). Bar detection barfs on encountering the >> first bar. You can't let bars be entered automagically. >> >> -- >> David Kastrup >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lilypond-user mailing list >> lilypond-user@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >> > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
