Nicolas Sceaux <nicolas.sce...@free.fr> writes: > All your points are valid. Being more used to Common Lisp, my coding > style tends to be much influenced by it.
It was not a personal criticism: it is always preferable to get something done than philosophize about how to do it. I was just stating why, at the current point of time, efforts of mine in that direction are not likely. The main thing holding me up is that Emacs is not up to par for doing this in a "natural" way, and I don't want to invest the time needed to do it the "hard" way like you. It is too likely I'd be running out of steam at some point of time without anybody picking up the remainders. > That's mainly why I have not advertised this emacs mode. It works for > me, but I don't think it's good enough to make a publishable software. > > I am keen on seeing your progress. Having a useful lilypond mode in > Emacs would be really great. Their will not be much progress to see for a while. I started with pestering the CEDET developers with telling them why CEDET as it stands does not make things as easy for me as possible. CEDET is slated to move to Bazaar as its VCS, and then frequent merges into Emacs are envisioned. It is not likely my contributions to progress will consist of much more than nagging people for quite a while. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
