The templates in the Learning Manual should be
as simple as possible, so I agree multiple files
should be eliminated.
By the same token, I don't think we need real
music here - the temptation would be to over-
complicate the template.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kieren MacMillan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "LilyPond Mailing List" <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: doc work
Graham (et al.):
The template for the string quartet with parts (A.3.2) unnecessarily
deals with multiple files — everything the template is supposed to
accomplish can be done "more simply" in a single file, either using
\pageBreak between \score blocks (for single-PDF output), or by
wrapping each score in a \book (for multiple-PDF output).
Any objections to me making this a one-file template?
I'm considering including both examples (single-PDF and multiple-PDF
output), so that users can choose.
Best,
Kieren.
p.s. In the spirit of the "Inspirational Headwords", does anyone else
think that these templates should be "real music"? =)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
