Hi! Well, I’m not so interested in what you think is a "point".
All I am asking for is good practice to override code in LilyPond in a way that doesn’t interfere with the codebase. Is it possible to discuss that instead of reasons? I think all of us interested in using LilyPond will learn from that. And I also think there are many roads to good music. By the way, I have learned how to do it "my way" now, and big thanks for all the replies. Kind regards, /MO > 22 apr. 2025 kl. 15:22 skrev [email protected]: > > David Wright: > ... >> But looking at the languages LP supports (NR § Note names in >> other languages, ~p8), adding a language is cheap, even when >> notes have more than one name (so long as they don't overlap). >> So for the long term, I would file a wishlist bug (LP calls >> them issues, I believe) with a definitive list of notes and >> modifiers and, of course, the language's name. >> >> Obviously, I think the name should be chosen by the people who >> would use it. There are several names for mixtures of English >> and Swedish, but why should the word "english" be involved. > ... > > Thoose combiniation are slang and is a result of the heavy > influence english have on our language today and it is not > really somehing you'd wish to use officially. Perhaps something > like svenska_abc, _ny or _modern is better. > > But since thoose note names is only used inside lilypond files > I personally don't see any point of having anything else than > the dutch names, it also is the one easiest on the fingers. > > Regards, > /Karl Hammar > >
