On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:45, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > "m...@mikesolomon.org" <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > >>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would it >>> be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just let the >>> code for rest height in general return the height of the standard rest >>> glyph without bothering to check the on-staffiness? >> >> I wanna say that they do (it'd be a difference of half a ledger line) >> but I could be wrong. I know nothing about metafont - someone more >> competent than I would have to check. > > Well, there is the problem that staff lines may be reconfigured in > thickness, but "apart from that (TM)", it would seem to me like counting > the half ledger line into the glyph height for the glyph intended to be > used on a staff line would not seem to cause problems, would it? Or > would it shift material around that is designed to align to staff lines > and thus is not supposed to check for collisions with them for the sake > of placement? >
The easiest way to test this out is to get a baseline and then edit line 249 of rest.cc so that instead of: SCM m = brew_internal_stencil (me, a != X_AXIS); it reads SCM m = brew_internal_stencil (me, false); and then run make check. You'll see right away how (if at all) this changes things. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
