On 5 nov. 2012, at 10:11, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would >>> it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just >>> let the code for rest height in general return the height of the >>> standard rest glyph without bothering to check the on-staffiness? > > I don't understand. A 64th rest glyph certainly has a larger height > than a glyph for the whole rest.
No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1 compared to rests.1o in the Feta font. > >> I wanna say that they do (it'd be a difference of half a ledger >> line) but I could be wrong. I know nothing about metafont - someone >> more competent than I would have to check. > > It seems that you mean something special if you talk about `height'... > The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent (rests.1 versus rests.1o). Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
