On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > "m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > >> On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> What's that? auto-numbering will only be active if >>> footnote-auto-numbering is set in the layout? Which it isn't by >>> default? And where there is no documentation around explaining how and >>> why you should do that? >> >> >> >> Several typos are in here. \auto-footnote does work automatically, >> and footnote-auto-numbering no longer exists (I forgot to remove this >> when I forgot to remove a similar statement in the other doc string). > > footnote-auto-numbering is present in the _code_. This is not just a > question of the doc string. There _is_ user-level documentation in the > notation manual (as a warning) mentioning, something like one has to set > it to ##f if one wants to be using non-auto footnumbers.
I just pushed a fix to staging that gets rid of this - the lookup was useless, as the auto-numbering variable in this file always returned true. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
