On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote:
LGTM.
From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default
for
auto-numbering (which is th typical case)...
It is the same as with \mark (we don't have \autoMark either). One might consider moving the footnote mark argument to last position, but the footnote text is potentially long, and so it better comes last so that one is not surprised at what follows afterwards. There are too many arguments either way for comfort. But I think that making this comparable to \mark is sensible. http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
