On 2012/01/10 13:18:03, dak wrote:
On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote: > LGTM. > > From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use \default
for
> auto-numbering (which is th typical case)...
It is the same as with \mark (we don't have \autoMark either). One
might
consider moving the footnote mark argument to last position
Actually, one could juggle the order of arguments around such that the optional arguments can't be confused with the next argument. Like putting the footnote mark first, position next, Grob spec next, footnote text last. In that manner, you could leave off either Grob spec or footnote mark without needing to say \default. And even if one writes \default for autonumbering, having it directly after the command will look more like \mark. http://codereview.appspot.com/5527058/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
