"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes: > On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:23 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> What's that? auto-numbering will only be active if >> footnote-auto-numbering is set in the layout? Which it isn't by >> default? And where there is no documentation around explaining how and >> why you should do that? > > > > Several typos are in here. \auto-footnote does work automatically, > and footnote-auto-numbering no longer exists (I forgot to remove this > when I forgot to remove a similar statement in the other doc string).
footnote-auto-numbering is present in the _code_. This is not just a question of the doc string. There _is_ user-level documentation in the notation manual (as a warning) mentioning, something like one has to set it to ##f if one wants to be using non-auto footnumbers. I consider it unlikely that footnotes in markup have been used all that much, given the incoherent state of both documentation as well as the code itself. So I am not worried all that much if convert-ly can't deal with markup footnotes nicely. It does not look like LilyPond itself can deal with markup footnotes all that nicely. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
