On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Karl Hammar <k...@aspodata.se> wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Karl Hammar <k...@aspodata.se> wrote: >> > Han-Wen Nienhuys: >> >> Werner, can you have a look at http://codereview.appspot.com/4819041 ? >> > There is no blot on the stack below (as indicated by the comment), >> there is; the dup puts it on the stack. The comment indicate the >> state after the call. > > /draw_round_box % width height x y blot > { > w h x y b > dup > w h x y b b > 0.0 gt > w h x y b a_bool % the a_bool it consumed by the ifelse below > { > w h x y b > setlinewidth % w h x y > w h x y > 0 setlinecap > 1 setlinejoin > w h x y > rmoveto % b w h > w h > currentpoint % b w h x1 y1 > 4 2 roll % b x1 y1 w h > 4 copy > rectfill > rectstroke > } { > pop % w h x y > rmoveto % w h > currentpoint % w h x1 y1 > 4 2 roll % x1 y1 w h > rectfill > } ifelse > } bind def > > After "dup" there is two "blot"s, "gt" consumes one and "setlinewidth" > the other.
I'm sorry - I misunderstood; I thought you saw a problem with the code rather than the comments. pushed as 5291daf785cd215145473781612732de94890ba0 -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
