2011/7/27 Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jan Warchoł > <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I think this is an other issue. Due to rounding, PDF viewers can err >>> the placement of the barline by a pixel. This is insolvable, as there >>> is no way to hint that the barline should coincide with the staffline, >>> yet we need to go the end of the barline to get the correct effect in >>> the corners in staves. >> >> I'd accept this if it were not for the fact that Finale seems to >> handle this perfectly. I've never experienced any sticking out >> barlines in Finale pdfs, neither on screen nor in print (i can send >> you some if you want). Also, the thickness of the stems and barlines >> is consistent in Finale pdfs (i.e. it looks like second image from >> here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-07/msg00076.html >> while Lily output looks like first one). >> I'd say that the fact that Finale does something this basic better >> than LilyPond is a serious insult to us, given how much Finale sucks >> in these matters (for example in flag attachment, see attached). > > You can make the problem disappear by > > - hard coding the output to a certain resolution
Umm, i don't understand what you mean... > - making the bar go to the middle of the staffline, rather than the outside. I have a patch doing this: http://codereview.appspot.com/4809057 > both have disadvantages. (what does finale's barline at the end of a > staff look like?) Sharp and pointy, example attached. cheers, Janek
Canticorum.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
